|
AIA Green Design Showcase
Part II of the Series
The Atlanta Chapter of The American Institute
of Architects Committee on the Environment (COTE) accepted
submissions from local designers for both built and
un-built projects for display and discussion at Greenprints
2003. The projects selected illustrate regional efforts
to integrate environmentally responsible design methods
and materials into buildings.
|
 |
Projects addressed environmental design in the
following categories:
- SITE - preserving
water and eco-system quality
- ENERGY - conserving
and creating
- WASTE - limiting
during construction and/or occupation
- MATERIALS – recycling,
re-using, regional sourcing and/or limiting
- INDOOR AIR QUALITY
– protecting and/or enhancing
- LIVABLE COMMUNITIES
– enhancing connections within communities
- INTEGRATION – integrating
green design in the design process
This article includes six of the 18 projects
submitted. The next issue of the Southface Journal will have
the six remaining entries highlighted. Here are some architects’
insights that bring to life the goals, attributes and challenges
of each project.
|
|

The National Environmentally Sound
Production Agricultural Laboratory holistically integrated
site/landscape, materials, energy efficiency, air/water
quality and waste.
|
National Environmentally Sound
Production Agricultural Laboratory – Academic Building
by Harrison Design Group for the University of Georgia
LEED™/Sustainable Consultants: The Epsten
Group, Inc.
This Board of Regents Laboratory for the
University of Georgia integrates laboratories, offices,
greenhouses, meeting areas and visitor areas while incorporating
a variety of sustainable design concepts. Site/landscape,
energy efficiency, materials, water quality and waste
were all considered in the design.
|
|
This was a pioneering project for the
Board of Regents, and design goals had to be carefully
balanced with cost restraints. Recognized with an AIA
Georgia Honor Award for Excellence in Architecture,
Sustainable Design, this project is intended to serve
as a prototype for future facilities, demonstrating
the practical applications of energy conservation, ecological
impact and sustainable design, combined with state-of-the-art
technology, incorporated within conservative budget
constraints.
|
|
|

It’s estimated that the Emory Math
& Science building will have almost 20 percent reduction
in total energy consumption because of the energy efficiency
measures incorporated in the design and building process.
|
Science and Mathematics Building
– Emory University Education and Research Facility
by Cooper Carry
LEED™/Sustainable Consultants: CH2MHill,
Hydro Environmental, Travis Pruitt, Uzun & Case, Newcomb
& Boyd
Emory University’s science and mathematics
building provides classroom, lecture and office space
in a design expected to be LEED™® certified. Water efficiency
and site planning were particular areas of consideration
for this building. The building was sited to minimize
the impact on existing forest and reduce the visual
impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
|
|
Existing turf areas have been converted
to forest to compensate for areas removed in construction.
A stormwater retention vault and xeriscaped landscaping
eliminates the need for potable water to be used for
irrigation.
Communication between designers, contractors
and subcontractors was identified as a challenge for
the team, especially given the scale of this particular
project.
|
|
|

The Golf Clubhouse has been designed
to incorporate daylighting in every space.
|
Golf Clubhouse– Richard Russell
State Park, Elberton, GA
by MSTSD, Inc.
LEED™/Sustainable Consultants: The Epsten
Group, Inc.
The golf clubhouse planned for the Russell
State Park golf course will be within a permanently
preserved public parkland adjacent to a recreational
lake.
A goal for this project was to demonstrate
that a typical public design-bid-build process and off-the-shelf
affordable technology can easily result in a LEED™ Certified
building. Ultimate success will be determined upon completion
of construction, but the design team is confident that
the project will meet the goal of LEED™ Certification
without compromise.
|
| The clubhouse is also intended
to serve the community in ways beyond just golf—it includes
a conference room available for luncheons, business meetings,
and weddings. |
|
|

The Visitor’s Center uses many recycled
and reused materials, and has a 98% recycled aluminum
roof.
|
State Park Visitors Center– Okefenokee
State Park, Waycross, GA
by Culpepper, McAuliffe and Meaders, Inc.
LEED™/Sustainable Consultants: The Epsten
Group, Inc.
|
|
The Fargo Visitors Center is currently
under construction in the Okefenokee State Park. The
center is to provide educational displays both on the
natural environment of the park and on the sustainable
design aspects of the building itself, and it is hoped
the center will achieve a LEED™ gold rating.
Control of runoff, water efficiency and
erosion control were major concerns for the project.
Permeable parking surfaces and a compact construction
site help to mitigate runoff and erosion.
As with many LEED™ projects, the team
says that having LEED™ consultants work more closely
with designers earlier in the process would have been
advantageous.
|
|
|

Unlike most laboratory buildings
that cost $2.50 to $3.50 per square foot per year to
operate, according to the energy analysis run by the
designers, the Whitehead building will only cost about
$1.70 per square foot per year to operate.
|
Biomedical Research Building–
Emory University Whitehead Biomedical Research Building
by Hellmuth Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.
LEED™/Sustainable Consultants: Nottingham
Brook and Pennington, CH2MHill
This LEED™ silver educational building
is equipped with special heat-recovery systems projected
to save $100,000 in energy costs annually and condensate-recovery
units that could save 2.5 million gallons of water per
year. Storm water from the roof and plaza is collected
and used for irrigation. With its many windows, natural
light is available to 90 percent of the building’s occupants,
saving on electricity.
It was decided to go for LEED™ certification
after the building was already under construction, yet
the team was very successful in meeting the LEED™ requirements.
The project has received the 2002 Energy User News Best
New Project Award and has been submitted for an ASHRAE
award.
The Emory Board of Trustees has endorsed
LEED™ for use as a guiding principle in the development
of all the University’s construction and renovation
projects.
|
|
|

Especially useful for a University
setting, a primary goal in the design of Technology
Square was to enhance opportunities for access other
than by car. Creating a safer bridge, across the freeway,
for pedestrians and bikers and the availability of bicycle
racks, showers and changing rooms encourage people to
ride or walk rather than drive automobiles through the
area.
|
Technology Square– Georgia Tech
education and retail space
by Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.
LEED™/Sustainable Consultants: The Epsten
Group, Inc.
Technology Square’s integrated classroom
and commercial structures occupy 600,000 square feet—of
which 200,000 are LEED™— in Atlanta’s Midtown, contributing
to the rapid renewal of the area. This building complements
the larger strategic plan of Georgia Tech and also the
state’s plans for economic development in sustainable
environmental technology. It also encourages interdisciplinary
collaboration to create a curriculum that focuses on
sustainability. A LEED™ Accredited professional has
been on board during the entire design and construction
process, coordinating the LEED™ team process and assisting
with efforts to develop high-performance, sustainable
solutions.
|
|
Design challenges included lighting efficiency
in high-ceilinged retail spaces and achieving daylighting
throughout the building within budget constraints. The
project also sought to address transportation issues
through access to Atlanta public transit and natural
gas trolleys to the main area of Georgia Tech’s campus.
|
|
* The information provided in this article was
obtained from the person(s) who submitted the respective projects’
2003 AIA Showcase applications. For information about sustainable
design consultants on the projects in the Summer 2002 AIA
Showcase article, please contact Southface. This series of
articles does not reflect the opinion of Southface or any
Southface staff.
|