|

|
 |
AIA Green Design Showcase
The Atlanta Chapter of The American Institute
of Architects Committee on the Environment (COTE) accepted
submissions from local designers for both built and
un-built projects for display and discussion at Greenprints
2003. The projects selected illustrate regional efforts
to integrate environmentally responsible design methods
and materials into buildings. |
| AIA/Atlanta Chapter of COTE exhibitors
showcased green design projects during the 2003 Greenprints
conference. One of many viewers, Paul Dolan of Fetzer
Vineyards (foreground), views the exhibit prior to
the Visionary Dinner event held on February 14. The
exhibit was also displayed in the Green Tradeshow for
the duration of the conference. |
Projects addressed environmental
design in the following categories:
- SITE - preserving water and eco-system
quality
- ENERGY - conserving and creating
- WASTE - limiting during construction
and/or occupation
- MATERIALS – recycling, re-using,
regional sourcing and/or limiting
- INDOOR AIR QUALITY – protecting and/or
enhancing
- LIVABLE COMMUNITIES – enhancing connections
within communities
- INTEGRATION – integrating green design
in the design process
This article includes six of the 18 projects
submitted. The next two issues of the Southface Journal
each will have six of the other outstanding entries
highlighted. Here are some architects’ insights that
bring to life the goals, attributes and challenges
of each project. |
 |
SWEETWATER CREEK— State Park Visitor’s
Center and Museum by Gerding Architects, LLC
Gerding saw three green concepts as particularly
important to this project, including; composting toilets,
a vegetated roof and rainwater collection/re-use. Due
to the past contamination of the creek system, Gerding
felt it was very important for this building to educate
the public, through demonstration, about processing
waste on-site without contaminating the ground water
with a septic system.
|
| Sweetwater Creek, not yet
built, aims for LEED™ certification by including many
sustainable design measures seen here in this site plan
by Gerding Architects. |
 |
TWIN CREEKS Research, Science
and Education Center—Great Smoky Mountains National
Park Facility by Lord, Aeck & Sargent
Lord, Aeck & Sargent recognized that even
though this project is staffed by a firm and owner/client
dedicated to sustainable design, it still requires constant
vigilance to reach sustainable goals. The project would
have benefited from even earlier involvement of all
consultants in the process. The firm found the collaboration
with ENSAR Group, an energy/thermal and daylighting
optimization consultant, yielded great benefits. At
50 percent design development Lord, Aeck & Sargent was
on target to meet LEED™ V2.0/2.1 Silver Level certification
at a minimum of 36 points.
|
|
The Twin Creeks project is designated
as an International Biosphere Reserve and a World Heritage
Site, in addition it will undergo an All Taxa Biodiversity
Inventory to catalog all living species.
|
 |
BRUCE CIRCLE— Loft-style Single
Family Dwelling by Scott Ball of Community Housing Resource
Center
A project of the Community Housing Resource
Center (CHRC), this demonstration house has many sustainable
design features. CHRC did not, however, evaluate the
project by the standards of EarthCraft House or Energy
Star—both residential, green rating programs in the
Southeast. Although challenging at times, CHRC said
the project was extremely educational.
|
|
This loft-style home on Bruce Circle
is not a typical family dwelling but beneficially includes
sustainable design features.
|
|
For instance, although insulated, CHRC
was not happy with energy performance of the salvaged,
wood-framed windows used. Also, after trying several
approaches to installing the insulated polycarbonate
panels that form the clerestory windows, they finally
were able to seal the windows tight (to form the stud
framing). Yet another challenge was the large size of
the SIPs, which made them difficult to maneuver.
Always addressing the issue of long-term
affordability, CHRC continuously incorporates energy
efficiency and durability into the costs of consistently
operating and maintaining a home.
|
 |
WILDLIFE CENTER— Dining Hall and
Adult Lodge by THW Design
The Wildlife Center had many goals, ultimately
aiming to make the center’s presence a ‘polite intrusion,’
giving wildlife the best chance to sustain.
Other sustainable methods included minimizing
development impact to the natural systems, dispersing
parking to minimize the impact to the terrain, providing
positive way-finding, providing a cohesive order and
designing architecture to blend into the landscape.
In hindsight, THW believes they could
have pushed “green materials” to a greater limit, and
a system for generating on-site energy to create a self-sustaining
project could have been employed.
THW also had difficulty finding sources
for Certified Wood Products, stating “the market didn’t
promote access to the supply needed.”
The Wildlife Center seeks LEED™ Certification,
as it was registered as a USGBC LEED™ 2.1 project.
|
| As a Wildlife Center, much
focus is kept on the outdoors but to maintain good indoor
air quality while preserving the environment, low or no-VOC
paints, adhesives and sealants is one sustainability measure
used. |
 |
LEN FOOTE HIKE INN— Lodge for
Georgia State Parks by Reynolds Architects, Inc.
This prototypical LEED™-Existing Buildings
(LEED-EB™) project for Georgia State Parks, is one of
the first of its kind in the country. Reynolds Architects
offers one point of constructive criticism—LEED-EB™
does not address projects very well that have no air-conditioning
and humidity control. This project seeks a LEED-EB™
Gold Rating.
As a regional affiliate of the USGBC,
Southface held a LEED-EB™ workshop in June 2003 and
more LEED-EB™ discussion will be involved at the Greenprints
2004 Conference, March 18 & 19.
To get to Len Foote and see its 1.6
kW photovoltaic (solar power) system, there is a five-mile
trail to hike from Amicalola State Park.
|
 |
HILLTOP SCHOOL—Montessori School
Daycare & K-8 School by ArchitectureWorks
ArchitectureWorks’ biggest goal was to
attain the highest LEED™ rating possible while balancing
the other project goals and keeping construction costs
reasonable.
ArchitectureWorks believes incorporation
of the Hilltop School strategies and technologies could
be readily adopted in other commercial or residential
buildings in the region. The project aimed for a LEED™
version 2.0 Gold rating, and at the end of schematic
design, ArchitectureWorks had 45 points allotted to
reach this rating.
|
| Located in Mt. Laurel,
Alabama, 30 miles South of Birmingham, attached to the
Hilltop School is an eco center where public educational
events about sustainability will be held. |
|
This project's team members suggested
that project teams invite code officials to design charrettes
to encourage buy-in of unfamiliar systems, such as gray
water, that are limited by local codes.
“Major budget constraints tend to exist
because of perceived higher costs for unfamiliar materials
and sustainable design measures, rather than actual
costs,” said Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates’
Richard Simonton, who worked on the Hilltop School.
|
|
|
|